Comments on: What is the correct translation to latin for the following sentence? http://synapsiswarehouse.org/latin/what-is-the-correct-translation-to-latin-for-the-following-sentence Tue, 16 Feb 2010 04:08:59 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2 hourly 1 By: aera http://synapsiswarehouse.org/latin/what-is-the-correct-translation-to-latin-for-the-following-sentence/comment-page-1#comment-4514 aera Fri, 30 Oct 2009 05:45:59 +0000 http://synapsiswarehouse.org/latin/what-is-the-correct-translation-to-latin-for-the-following-sentence#comment-4514 omnia pro vobis omnes res pro vobis (if you want to sound like Cicero) quidque pro vobis (another one of Cicero's) nihil non pro vobis (another Cicero!) This one is rare.<br><b>References : </b><br> omnia pro vobis
omnes res pro vobis (if you want to sound like Cicero)
quidque pro vobis (another one of Cicero’s)
nihil non pro vobis (another Cicero!) This one is rare.
References :

]]> By: dollhaus@sbcglobal.net http://synapsiswarehouse.org/latin/what-is-the-correct-translation-to-latin-for-the-following-sentence/comment-page-1#comment-4513 dollhaus@sbcglobal.net Fri, 30 Oct 2009 05:05:59 +0000 http://synapsiswarehouse.org/latin/what-is-the-correct-translation-to-latin-for-the-following-sentence#comment-4513 Nihil non pro vobis. This would be better if you want to emphasize the 'everything'. It's a double negative that translates literally as 'not nothing'. That's not good English, but it is good Latin. The Romans used that term as an emphatic form for 'everything'.<br><b>References : </b><br> Nihil non pro vobis.

This would be better if you want to emphasize the ‘everything’. It’s a double negative that translates literally as ‘not nothing’. That’s not good English, but it is good Latin. The Romans used that term as an emphatic form for ‘everything’.
References :

]]> By: lastuntakenscreenname http://synapsiswarehouse.org/latin/what-is-the-correct-translation-to-latin-for-the-following-sentence/comment-page-1#comment-4512 lastuntakenscreenname Fri, 30 Oct 2009 04:41:59 +0000 http://synapsiswarehouse.org/latin/what-is-the-correct-translation-to-latin-for-the-following-sentence#comment-4512 "Omnia vobis" or "Omnia pro vobis." (I can see arguments either way on those two, but more likely the latter.) In Latin, "everything" is normally neuter plural, which handily obviates the problem of figuring out whether the everything is the object or the subject. "Omnis pro vobis" is more like "each person for you." Edit: If I was going to say "nihil non" instead of "omnia" on a tattoo or ring or something I think I'd prefer the shorter form "nil non".<br><b>References : </b><br> "Omnia vobis" or "Omnia pro vobis." (I can see arguments either way on those two, but more likely the latter.)

In Latin, "everything" is normally neuter plural, which handily obviates the problem of figuring out whether the everything is the object or the subject. "Omnis pro vobis" is more like "each person for you."

Edit: If I was going to say "nihil non" instead of "omnia" on a tattoo or ring or something I think I’d prefer the shorter form "nil non".
References :

]]> By: superwow_rl http://synapsiswarehouse.org/latin/what-is-the-correct-translation-to-latin-for-the-following-sentence/comment-page-1#comment-4511 superwow_rl Fri, 30 Oct 2009 04:21:59 +0000 http://synapsiswarehouse.org/latin/what-is-the-correct-translation-to-latin-for-the-following-sentence#comment-4511 omnis pro vobis is correct.<br><b>References : </b><br> omnis pro vobis is correct.
References :

]]> By: Caicos Turkey http://synapsiswarehouse.org/latin/what-is-the-correct-translation-to-latin-for-the-following-sentence/comment-page-1#comment-4510 Caicos Turkey Fri, 30 Oct 2009 04:00:59 +0000 http://synapsiswarehouse.org/latin/what-is-the-correct-translation-to-latin-for-the-following-sentence#comment-4510 Omnis pro vobis.<br><b>References : </b><br> Omnis pro vobis.
References :

]]>